{"id":972,"date":"2026-05-05T02:26:33","date_gmt":"2026-05-05T02:26:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/?p=972"},"modified":"2026-05-05T02:26:33","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T02:26:33","slug":"courts-searched-2026-05-04-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/?p=972","title":{"rendered":"Courts Searched \u2014 2026-05-04"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Daily Summary &mdash; 2026-05-04<\/h2>\n<div class=\"ca-status-summary\"><strong>Daily Summary &mdash; 2026-05-04.<\/strong> 0 case(s) published, 20 investigated but skipped, 246 opinion(s) surfaced across 8 court(s) searched.<\/div>\n<div class=\"ca-status-counts\">\n<div class=\"ca-stat\"><span class=\"ca-stat-num\">0<\/span><span class=\"ca-stat-lbl\">Published<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ca-stat\"><span class=\"ca-stat-num\">20<\/span><span class=\"ca-stat-lbl\">Skipped<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ca-stat\"><span class=\"ca-stat-num\">246<\/span><span class=\"ca-stat-lbl\">Opinions surfaced<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ca-stat\"><span class=\"ca-stat-num\">8<\/span><span class=\"ca-stat-lbl\">Courts searched<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ca-stat\"><span class=\"ca-stat-num\">0<\/span><span class=\"ca-stat-lbl\">Email mentions<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Cases Published<\/h2>\n<p><em>No new cases published in this run.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>Cases Investigated but Not Published<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Marriage of Nishida &amp; Kamoda<\/strong> (G064200M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion G064200 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cleare et al. v. Super. Ct.<\/strong> (A173289N, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A173289 already covered (N-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Aerni v. RR San Dimas, L.P.<\/strong> (B341484M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion B341484 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dept. of Water Resources Cases<\/strong> (C103207M, 3rd District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion C103207 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>P. v. Tzul<\/strong> (B343256M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion B343256 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Chi v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles<\/strong> (A172237M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A172237 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Marriage of Jenkins<\/strong> (A169217M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A169217 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Ct.<\/strong> (E085766N, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion E085766 already covered (N-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cleare et al. v. Super. Ct.<\/strong> (A173289M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A173289 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Meiner v. Superior Court<\/strong> (G065769M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion G065769 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Court<\/strong> (E085766M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Two) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion E085766 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Domestic Partnership of Campos &amp; Munoz<\/strong> (D085584M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division One) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion D085584 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Nichols v. Alghannam<\/strong> (C100433M, 3rd District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion C100433 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc.<\/strong> (A171546M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A171546 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Semaan v. Mosier<\/strong> (G064385M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion G064385 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Navellier v. Putnam<\/strong> (A172077M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A172077 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>P. v. Dixon<\/strong> (F087625M, 5th District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion F087625 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Microsoft Corp. v. Super. Ct.<\/strong> (B347381M, 2nd District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion B347381 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>P. v. Aguilar<\/strong> (D083172M, 4th District Court of Appeal, Division One) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion D083172 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Marriage of Starr<\/strong> (A172153M, 1st District Court of Appeal) &mdash; Modification order; underlying opinion A172153 already covered (M-suffix dedup).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Courts Searched<\/h2>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Court<\/th>\n<th>Source<\/th>\n<th>Opinions found<\/th>\n<th>Kept after triage<\/th>\n<th>Notes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>California Supreme Court<\/td>\n<td>courts.ca.gov<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>Included in 235-row published listing pull; no new Supreme Court opinions in window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>California Courts of Appeal (all districts)<\/td>\n<td>courts.ca.gov<\/td>\n<td>235<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>All rows already in seen-state from prior runs; 20 M\/N-suffix modification orders auto-skipped (dedup against earlier-posted opinions).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9th Circuit Court of Appeals<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: ca9)<\/td>\n<td>11<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>All rows already in seen-state from prior runs.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>U.S. District Court \u2014 Central District of California<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: cacd)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>No new opinions returned for window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>U.S. District Court \u2014 Eastern District of California<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: caed)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>No new opinions returned for window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>U.S. District Court \u2014 Northern District of California<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: cand)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>No new opinions returned for window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>U.S. District Court \u2014 Southern District of California<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: casd)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>No new opinions returned for window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>U.S. Supreme Court (California-related)<\/td>\n<td>CourtListener API v4 (court_id: scotus)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>No California-related SCOTUS opinions in window.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Courts Not Searched Today<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>California Superior Courts (trial-level)<\/strong> &mdash; Trial-court orders are not routinely published; no listing scraper exists.<\/li>\n<li><strong>California State Bar Court<\/strong> &mdash; Outside core appellate\/federal coverage; not in current scraper set.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Federal bankruptcy courts in California<\/strong> &mdash; Bankruptcy opinions are tracked separately on PACER; not in current scraper set.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Email Newsletter Ingest<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>Count<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Messages processed<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Newsletter URLs (case-source)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Case mentions extracted from newsletter bodies<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Server Disk Space (192.168.1.21)<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>Value<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Available<\/td>\n<td>1.7T<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Used<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Status<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"ca-disk-badge ca-disk-ok\">OK<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Sources Consulted<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>courts.ca.gov\/opinions (published + unpublished listings, all CA appellate divisions)<\/li>\n<li>CourtListener API v4 \u2014 court_id: ca9, cacd, caed, cand, casd, scotus<\/li>\n<li>Newsletter inbox (IMAP, read-only)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>0 case(s) published, 20 investigated but skipped, 8 court(s) searched.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_ca_reported":"","_ca_court":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[],"ca_court":[],"class_list":["post-972","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-daily-status"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/972","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=972"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/972\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=972"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=972"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=972"},{"taxonomy":"ca_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/california.shuster.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fca_court&post=972"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}